Standard adult BMI range
50.4 to 67.8 kg
111.0 to 149.5 lb
BMI 18.5 to 24.9 (WHO adult categories).
Health
See four historical ideal-weight formulas and BMI-based weight ranges side by side for your height.
Adults only. Your inputs stay in your browser and are never sent anywhere.
Historical estimates, not targets or a diagnosis. The Devine formula began as a drug-dosing rule.
| Formula | Kilograms | Pounds |
|---|---|---|
| Robinson (1983) | 57.4 kg | 126.6 lb |
| Miller (1983) | 59.8 kg | 131.9 lb |
| Devine (1974) | 56.9 kg | 125.5 lb |
| Hamwi (1964) | 56.6 kg | 124.8 lb |
Across the four formulas: 56.6 to 59.8 kg (124.8 to 131.9 lb).
50.4 to 67.8 kg
111.0 to 149.5 lb
BMI 18.5 to 24.9 (WHO adult categories).
50.4 to 62.3 kg
111.0 to 137.4 lb
BMI 18.5 to 22.9 (WHO expert consultation, Asian populations).
BMI is a screening ratio. It does not measure body fat and is not a diagnosis.
ChangelogHow we test this calculatorEmbed this calculator
For 5 ft 5 in (165.0 cm), four old formulas land between 56.6 kg and 59.8 kg. They are historical estimates, not a target.
The formulas are straight lines: a base weight at 5 ft, plus a fixed amount for each inch above it. Men and women have different constants. Nothing else about you is used.
x = height in inches − 60weight in kg = 45.5 + 2.3 × xThe other three formulas use the same steps with different constants.
The BMI range comes from weight = BMI × height in metres squared. It gives a span of weights, not one ideal figure, and the formula results need not fall inside it.
The formulas add weight per inch over 5 ft, so under 5 ft the arithmetic simply runs backwards.
This calculator still shows those results for heights from 4 ft, with a warning. For example, the Devine formula for a woman of 4 ft gives 17.9 kg, which is not a meaningful weight. The BMI ranges are unaffected.
These formulas use height and sex only. Body fat, energy needs and life stage tell you things they cannot.
The BMI calculator shows where a weight falls in the WHO adult categories, including the lower Asian cut-offs. The body fat calculator estimates composition from tape measurements, and the BMR and TDEE calculator estimates daily energy.
During pregnancy, a different guide applies; see the pregnancy weight gain calculator.
Mistake: Treating the "ideal" label as a target to hit.
Instead: Read it as a historical estimate, and talk to a health professional about weight goals.
Mistake: Averaging the four results into one number.
Instead: Look at the spread. It shows how uncertain these formulas are.
Mistake: Using the Asian BMI range without knowing why.
Instead: It is one more way to read BMI for some populations. Ask a clinician which applies to you.
Mistake: Using the result for a child or teenager.
Instead: These formulas are for adults only.
This tool is for general information and is not medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Talk to a qualified healthcare professional about your situation.
A separate script recomputes every test case two ways, in exact fractions and in a rearranged floating-point form, and checks each value.
Read how we test our calculators, or browse more health calculators.
It is a short equation that turns height and sex into a weight estimate. The four used here date from 1964 to 1983 and were written for clinicians, not as health targets.
Each uses its own base weight at 5 ft and its own amount per extra inch. The differences show how rough the estimates are.
It was published in 1974 to help estimate drug doses, such as gentamicin. It was never meant to say what a person should weigh.
No. It is a historical estimate. It ignores muscle, bone size, body fat, age and health conditions. Talk to a health professional about weight goals.
It is the span of weights whose BMI falls between 18.5 and 24.9 at your height. BMI is a screening ratio and does not diagnose anything.
A WHO expert consultation found that health risks can rise at lower BMI in Asian populations. This page shows 18.5 to 22.9 as a variant for comparison.
The formulas are defined per inch over 5 ft. Below that, this tool extends the same line and shows a warning, so very short heights can give unrealistically low figures.
No. These are adult formulas and do not cover children, teenagers or pregnancy.
The formulas are standard time-value-of-money results. We check every figure against golden values worked out independently, by closed form and by month-by-month simulation; see the methodology.
Written and maintained by Nitin Raturi, a software engineer (about the author). Last reviewed 22 Oct 2026; next review due by . Found an error? Tell us.